But unless it’s a situation where there’s just no other possibility (like a puck that’s clearly in a goalie’s trapper, which is all the way over the line), they need that frame. It doesn’t have to be there for long even one frame is enough. And once it’s initiated, they need to be able to see a view where the puck is completely over the line. First of all, it’s not a challenge - the review comes from the war room, not either team’s bench. The rulebook is fairly clear on a disputed play like this. And once that was the case, the odds of the call going the Leafs’ way plunged. But after consulting with the other officials, the call on the ice was no-goal. That’s frustrating, but it’s not necessarily wrong - we don’t want refs calling what they don’t see, and if Hebert truly doesn’t know if the puck is in then it’s not his job to pretend otherwise. He didn’t emphatically wave it off either he just kind of stared at it. That’s because the referee behind the net, Jean Hebert, didn’t signal a goal. You may have spotted that “almost” that I tacked onto the part about how everyone knew it was in. So should it have counted? Unfortunately for the Maple Leafs, that’s a different question. Instead, we can apply some common sense and say that the puck was tucked under Bobrovsky’s pad, it was over the goal line at some point, and almost everyone on the ice knew it. Could the puck have shifted to his skate or somewhere else by then? Maybe, although the physics don’t seem to make much sense. Almost immediately after, that part of the pad is in the net. You can see Rielly tuck the puck under Sergei Bobrovsky’s pad, and from the front angle, you can see where - right under the red part of his pad. The Panthers sure look like a team that knows it’s in too.īut fine, put that aside. Sure, they could be faking it, but the natural instinct for attacking players is to dig for a puck rather than try to pull off a spontaneous gaslighting. Rielly celebrates immediately, as do John Tavares, Mitch Marner and Ryan O’Reilly. Start with the reactions of the players, who have a better view of things than just about any camera. When you add up the evidence, that’s the most likely conclusion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |